Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Enhanced Chemical Detection in Sensor Array Data

Gregorius Airlangga(1*),

(1) Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of various machine learning models for classifying chemical substances using sensor array data from a wind tunnel facility. Six widely recognized machine learning algorithms were assessed: Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). The dataset, consisting of 288 sensor array features, was preprocessed and utilized to evaluate the models based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score through a 5-fold cross-validation method. The results indicated that ensemble methods, particularly Random Forest and Gradient Boosting, outperformed other models, achieving an accuracy and F1 score of over 99%. KNN also demonstrated high efficacy with similar performance metrics. In contrast, Logistic Regression showed modest results in comparison. The study's outcomes suggest that ensemble machine learning models are highly suitable for chemical detection tasks, potentially contributing to advancements in environmental monitoring and public safety. The findings also highlight the importance of quality data preprocessing in achieving optimal model performance. Future research directions include exploring hybrid models, deep learning techniques, and assessing model robustness against environmental variabilities. This research underscores the transformative potential of machine learning in chemical detection and paves the way for developing more sophisticated and reliable detection systems.

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. Chapman et al., “Combining chemometrics and sensors: Toward new applications in monitoring and environmental analysis,” Chem. Rev., vol. 120, no. 13, pp. 6048–6069, 2020.

D. Tyagi et al., “Recent advances in two-dimensional-material-based sensing technology toward health and environmental monitoring applications,” Nanoscale, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 3535–3559, 2020.

K. C. To, S. Ben-Jaber, and I. P. Parkin, “Recent developments in the field of explosive trace detection,” ACS Nano, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 10804–10833, 2020.

M. A. Al Mamun and M. R. Yuce, “Recent progress in nanomaterial enabled chemical sensors for wearable environmental monitoring applications,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 30, no. 51, p. 2005703, 2020.

F. Wen, T. He, H. Liu, H.-Y. Chen, T. Zhang, and C. Lee, “Advances in chemical sensing technology for enabling the next-generation self-sustainable integrated wearable system in the IoT era,” Nano Energy, vol. 78, p. 105155, 2020.

I. Yaroshenko et al., “Real-time water quality monitoring with chemical sensors,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 12, p. 3432, 2020.

N. Bhalla, Y. Pan, Z. Yang, and A. F. Payam, “Opportunities and challenges for biosensors and nanoscale analytical tools for pandemics: COVID-19,” ACS Nano, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 7783–7807, 2020.

H.-P. Wang et al., “Recent advances of chemometric calibration methods in modern spectroscopy: Algorithms, strategy, and related issues,” TrAC Trends Anal. Chem., vol. 153, p. 116648, 2022.

A. Venketeswaran et al., “Recent advances in machine learning for fiber optic sensor applications,” Adv. Intell. Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2100067, 2022.

W. Liu and T. Yairi, “A unifying view of multivariate state space models for soft sensors in industrial processes,” IEEE Access, 2023.

S. Rangineni, D. Marupaka, and A. K. Bhardwaj, “An examination of machine learning in the process of data integration,” Int. J. Comput. Trends Technol., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 79–85, 2023.

W. Huang, T. Li, J. Liu, P. Xie, S. Du, and F. Teng, “An overview of air quality analysis by big data techniques: Monitoring, forecasting, and traceability,” Inf. Fusion, vol. 75, pp. 28–40, 2021.

S. Zhong et al., “Machine learning: new ideas and tools in environmental science and engineering,” Environ. Sci. & Technol., vol. 55, no. 19, pp. 12741–12754, 2021.

P. Carracedo-Reboredo et al., “A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery,” Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J., vol. 19, pp. 4538–4558, 2021.

N. Ha, K. Xu, G. Ren, A. Mitchell, and J. Z. Ou, “Machine learning-enabled smart sensor systems,” Adv. Intell. Syst., vol. 2, no. 9, p. 2000063, 2020.

E. A. Bamidele et al., “Discovery and prediction capabilities in metal-based nanomaterials: An overview of the application of machine learning techniques and some recent advances,” Adv. Eng. Informatics, vol. 52, p. 101593, 2022.

M. Jaleel, A. Amira, and H. Malekmohamadi, “Classification of Gas Sensor Data Using Multiclass SVM,” in Science and Information Conference, 2023, pp. 1333–1344.

K. Dhibi, M. Mansouri, K. Bouzrara, H. Nounou, and M. Nounou, “An enhanced ensemble learning-based fault detection and diagnosis for grid-connected PV systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 155622–155633, 2021.

U. Yaqoob and M. I. Younis, “Chemical gas sensors: Recent developments, challenges, and the potential of machine learning—A review,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 8, p. 2877, 2021.

A.-A. Bouramdane, “Natural hazards in electricity grids: from landscape dynamics to optimal mitigation and adaptation approaches,” Emerg. Manag. Sci. Technol., no. emst-0024-0003, pp. 1–20, 2024.

Y. Li et al., “Recent advances and prospects of persistent luminescent materials in public health applications,” Chem. Eng. J., p. 150424, 2024.

D. Khorsandi et al., “Mxene-based nano (bio) sensors for the detection of biomarkers: A move towards intelligent sensors,” Microchem. J., p. 109874, 2023.

Y. Cao, T. A. Geddes, J. Y. H. Yang, and P. Yang, “Ensemble deep learning in bioinformatics,” Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 500–508, 2020.

M. Mazni, A. R. Husain, M. I. Shapiai, I. S. Ibrahim, D. W. Anggara, and R. Zulkifli, “An investigation into real-time surface crack classification and measurement for structural health monitoring using transfer learning convolutional neural networks and Otsu method,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 92, pp. 310–320, 2024.

D. P. Elpa, G. R. D. Prabhu, S.-P. Wu, K. S. Tay, and P. L. Urban, “Automation of mass spectrometric detection of analytes and related workflows: A review,” Talanta, vol. 208, p. 120304, 2020.

T. Liu et al., “Review on algorithm design in electronic noses: Challenges, status, and trends,” Intell. Comput., vol. 2, p. 12, 2023.

J. A. Covington, S. Marco, K. C. Persaud, S. S. Schiffman, and H. T. Nagle, “Artificial Olfaction in the 21 st Century,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 12969–12990, 2021.

B. R. Mil, “Gas Classification Dataset.” 2020.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30645/j-sakti.v8i1.785

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komputer & Informatika)
Published Papers Indexed/Abstracted By:


Jumlah Kunjungan :

View My Stats